Blocker v. Bandmine.com et al
| Tyrone Blocker |
| Bandmine.com, Webnames CA Inc and eBay Inc. |
| 3:2016cv01709 |
| August 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| John V. Acosta |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
98
OPINION and ORDER - I agree with Judge Acosta's recommendation and I ADOPT the F&R 96 as my own opinion. The claims against the remaining defendants, Webnames and Bandmine, are dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution.IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 8th day of June, 2018, by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman. (copy mailed to plaintiff) (peg)
|
|
Filing
84
OPINION and ORDER ADOPTING Judge Acosta's Amended Findings and Recommendation as my own opinion. Defendant eBay's Motion 8 to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint with prejudice and without leave to amend is GRANTED. Defendant Webnames' Motion 29 to Dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is GRANTED. Blocker's claims against Bandmine are DISMISSED for lack of timely service. Defendant eBay's Motion for Sanctions 29 is DENIED. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint against Defendant Webnames within 30 days of the filing date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 9/26/17 by Chief United States District Judge Michael W. Mosman.(copy mailed to Tyrone Blocker) (peg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
