Gilman v. Intel Corporation
| Scott M. Gilman |
| Intel Corporation |
| 3:2018cv00193 |
| January 30, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Portland (3) Office |
| Michael J. McShane |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
216
Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS Intel's motion for reconsideration (ECF 231 ). The Court reconsiders in part its Opinion and Order dated January 26, 2022 (ECF 225 ) resolving Intel's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (E CF 213 ). The Court now dismisses with prejudice the limited claims that it had allowed to proceed. The Court dismisses the remaining claims of Plaintiffs Carlo Garcia, Joseph Phillips, Kenneth Woolsey, City of New Castle, James Bradshaw, Andrew Mon toya, and Kathleen Greer for alleged conduct by Intel on or after September 1, 2017, specifically: (a) their nationwide claim under California's Unfair Competition Law alleging unfair conduct; (b) their nationwide claim alleging unjust enrichmen t; (c) their state subclass claims alleging unfair conduct; and (d) their state subclass claims alleging unconscionable conduct. This case is now dismissed in its entirety, and judgment will be entered. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed on 7/7/2022 by Judge Michael H. Simon. Filed in all member cases. (mja)
|
|
Filing
174
Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS IN PART Intel's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (ECF 213 ). The Court dismisses with prejudice all claims except those alleged by Plaintiffs Carlo Garcia, Joseph Phillips, Kenneth Woolsey, Ci ty of New Castle, James Bradshaw, Andrew Montoya, and Kathleen Greer for alleged conduct by Intel occurring on or after September 1, 2017. The Court also dismisses the claims of these seven Plaintiffs other than: (a) their nationwide claim under Cali fornia's Unfair Competition Law alleging unfair conduct; (b) their nationwide claim alleging unjust enrichment; (c) their state subclass claim alleging unfair conduct; and (d) their state subclass claim alleging unconscionable conduct. In short, the Court dismisses with prejudice all claims based on Intel's alleged conduct occurring before September 1, 2017. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed on 1/26/2022 by Judge Michael H. Simon. Filed in all Associated Cases of 3:18-md-02828-SI. (mja)
|
|
Filing
154
Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS Intel's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (ECF 190 ). The Court gives Plaintiffs LEAVE TO AMEND, within 28 days from the date of this Opinion and Order, only the following: (a) Plaintiffs' Nation wide claim under California's Unfair Competition Law alleging unfair conduct; (b) Plaintiffs' Nationwide claim for unjust enrichment; and (c) Plaintiffs' state subclass claims. The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed on 3/29/2021 by Judge Michael H. Simon. Filed in all associated cases of 3:18-md-02828-SI. (mja)
|
|
Filing
130
Opinion and Order - The Court GRANTS Intel's Corrected Motion to Dismiss (ECF 141 ). The Court also gives Plaintiffs LEAVE TO AMEND within 28 days from the date of this Opinion and Order. Finally, the Court directs the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Opinion and Order to the Clerk of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Signed on 3/27/2020 by Judge Michael H. Simon. Filed in all Associated Cases of 3:18-md-02828-SI. (mja)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
