Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
| Dollene Kay Crimmins |
| Commissioner Social Security Administration |
| 3:2022cv00352 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Ann L Aiken |
| Stacie F Beckerman |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Return of Service Executed as to Commissioner Social Security Administration served on 4/4/2022, answer due on 8/2/2022. Service specifically made upon Local U.S. Attorney, Regional Counsel or Agency, and the U.S. Attorney General. (Attachments: #1 Attachment USM-285 US Attorney General, #2 Attachment USM-285 Regional Counsel) (dino)
|
|
Filing 9
Notice of Appearance of David Burdett appearing on behalf of Commissioner Social Security Administration. Filed by Commissioner Social Security Administration. (Burdett, David)
|
|
Filing 8
Notice of Case Reassignment: This case has been reassigned from Judge Ann L. Aiken to Magistrate Judge Stacie F. Beckerman. (cw)
|
|
Filing 7
Consent by all Parties to Jurisdiction by U.S. Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Standing Order 06-mc-9130, the United States consents to jurisdiction by a U.S. Magistrate Judge.
|
|
Filing 6
Service Papers Received. Summons. Summons, USM 285 form(s), and copies of the Complaint and Order to Proceed in forma pauperis forwarded to the U.S. Marshals Service for service. (fp)
|
|
Filing 5
Summons Issued Electronically as to Commissioner Social Security Administration. NOTICE: Counsel shall print and serve the summonses and all documents issued by the Clerk at the time of filing upon all named parties in accordance with Local Rule 3-5. (joha)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Granting Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis #2 . Signed on 3/8/2022 by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (ck)
|
|
Filing 3
Social Security Procedural Order and Notice of Case Assignment to Judge Ann L. Aiken. Ordered by Judge Ann L. Aiken. (joha)
|
|
Filing 2
Application for Leave to Proceed IFP . Filed by Dollene Kay Crimmins. (Meserow, Nancy)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint to Review Final Decision of Commissioner (In forma pauperis status selected). Filed by Dollene Kay Crimmins against Kilolo Kijakazi (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons). (Meserow, Nancy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Crimmins v. Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Dollene Kay Crimmins | |
| Represented By: | Nancy J. Meserow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration | |
| Represented By: | Renata Gowie |
| Represented By: | David Burdett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
