Kipps v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Oregon District Court Kipps v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Kipps v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Colette D. Kipps
Defendant:	Commissioner Social Security Administration
Case Number:	6:2012cv00043
Filed:	January 10, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office:	Eugene Office
Presiding Judge:	Malcolm F. Marsh
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 5, 2013	Filing 24 ORDER ON EAJA ATTORNEY'S FEES. For the reasons stated above, plaintiff's Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA (#21), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $5,004.80 under the EAJA, subject to any offsets allowed under the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliif, ___U.S.___, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). If there are no such offsets, the check shall be made out to the plaintiff's attorney and mailed to plaintiff's attorney's office. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 03/05/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)
December 20, 2012	Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER. Based on the foregoing, the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with this opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/20/2012 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 5, 2013

Filing 24 ORDER ON EAJA ATTORNEY'S FEES. For the reasons stated above, plaintiff's Application for Fees Pursuant to EAJA (#21), is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $5,004.80 under the EAJA, subject to any offsets allowed under the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliif, ___U.S.___, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010). If there are no such offsets, the check shall be made out to the plaintiff's attorney and mailed to plaintiff's attorney's office. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 03/05/2013 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

December 20, 2012

Filing 16 OPINION AND ORDER. Based on the foregoing, the Commissioner's decision is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further administrative proceedings consistent with this opinion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed on 12/20/2012 by Judge Malcolm F. Marsh. (pvh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kipps v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Adrian L. Brown
Represented By:	Jeffrey R. McClain
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Colette D. Kipps
Represented By:	Phillip R Brockett
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?