Koch v. Jester et al
| Seth Edwin Koch |
| Darwin Crabtree, David Hansen, Superintendent Darin Humphreys, Robert Jester, John and Jane Does #1-10, David Schrenk, Gary Lawhead, Superintendent Michael Riggins, Karen Brazeau and Mike Cozner |
| 6:2012cv00613 |
| April 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Oregon |
| Eugene (6) Office |
| Anna J. Brown |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS Defendants Motion [84-1] to Dismiss, DENIES as moot Defendants Alternative Motion [84-2] for Abstention, and DISMISSES this matter without prejudice. Signed on 07/31/2014 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 14 page Opinion and Order for full text. (bb)
|
|
Filing
66
Opinion and Order: The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 60 as stated in the attached Order. Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than December 19, 2013, and Defendants respons ive pleading in the form of an Answer shall be filed no later than January 6, 2014. If Plaintiff does not file a Second Amended Complaint, this matter will proceed on Plaintiffs First Amended Complaintas modified by this Opinion and Order, and Defendants Answer thereto is due January 6, 2013. Signed on 12/6/2013 by Judge Anna J. Brown. See attached 18 page Opinion and Order. (bb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
