Thomas v. Oregon State Police et al
Plaintiff: Robert Thomas
Defendant: John Does 1-4, Oregon Parks & Recreation Department, Oregon State Police and Starplex Corporation
Case Number: 6:2012cv01167
Filed: June 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Oregon
Office: Eugene (6) Office
Presiding Judge: Ann L. Aiken
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 86 OPINION and ORDER: Granting Motion for Costs, $1,609.35, and Denying Motion for Attorney Fees 81 signed on 6/2/14 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (kf)
February 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 78 Opinion and Order. See formal order. Signed on 2/26/2014 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh)
June 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER: Granting Oregon Parks and Recreation Department's Motion for Summary Judgment 29 . Therefore, Oregon Parks and Recreation is dismissed as a defendant from this action. The parties' requests for oral argument are denied as unnecessary. Signed on 6/25/2013 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
September 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Granting in Part Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; Motion for a More Definite Statement 4 . DENIED with respect to the claims against OPRD. The Motion to Make More Definite and Certain the identities of John Does 1-4 is GRANTED, and plaintiff is allowed 75 days to conduct additional discovery to obtain information necessary to amend its complaint. The Motion to dismiss the State law claims and for plaintiff to re-plead under the OTCA is GRANTED. Defendants' request for oral argument is denied as unnecessary. Signed on 9/18/2012 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (lg)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thomas v. Oregon State Police et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-4
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon Parks & Recreation Department
Represented By: Heather J. Van Meter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Oregon State Police
Represented By: Heather J. Van Meter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starplex Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Thomas
Represented By: R. Grant Cook
Represented By: Kevin T. Lafky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?