Petty v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
||Commissioner Social Security Administration
||Heather P. Petty
||March 22, 2013
||Oregon District Court
||Eugene (6) Office
||Dennis J. Hubel
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV
|Cause of Action:
||42:1383 Review of HHS Decision
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|May 7, 2014
Opinion and Order. The decsision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to Sentence Four, 42 USC 405(g). Signed on 5/7/2014 by Judge James A. Redden. (sm)
|October 29, 2014
ORDER: Based on the stipulation (# 17 ) between the parties through their respective counsel it is hereby allowed that the Plaintiff is awarded attorney fees in the amount of $6,395.91 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and costs in th e amount of $0 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, for at total of $6,395.91, subject to debt owed the US Government described pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). If Plaintiff h as no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at: P.O. Box 12806, Salem, OR 97309-0806. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiffs attorney's office at the address stated above. Signed on October 29, 2014 by Judge James A. Redden. (eo)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.