Bracken v. PRO Enterprises
Corey L. Bracken |
PRO Enterprises |
6:2014cv01107 |
July 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Oregon |
Eugene (6) Office |
Ann L. Aiken |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities Act - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Order. Based upon the Stipulated Judgment of Dismissal With Prejudice 8 , this action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to any party. See stipulated judgment of dismissal with prejudice. Signed on 8/31/2014 by Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken. (rh) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Oregon District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bracken v. PRO Enterprises | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Corey L. Bracken | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: PRO Enterprises | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.