IN RE: MUSHROOM DIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION
2:2006cv00620 |
February 10, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
THOMAS N. ONEILL |
Anti-Trust |
15 U.S.C. ยง 25 Clayton Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1099 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF BI-LO, LLC (DOC. NO. 229 ON DOCKET NO. 15-6480) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED FOR DEFENDANTS AS TO BI-LO'S CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AND DENIED AS TO BI-LO'S CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. DEFENDANT CREEKSIDE MUSHROOM, LTD'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF BI-LO (DOC. NO. 231 ON DOCKET NO. 15-6480) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SUMMARY JUDGM ENT IS GRANTED FOR CREEKSIDE AS TO BI-LO'S CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AND DENIED AS TO BI-LO'S CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF. PLAINTIFF BI-LO HOLDING LLC'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO OPT OUT OF THE SECOND ROUND OF SETTLEMENT CLASSES 1095 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 9/1/20. 9/1/20 ENTERED & E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL. (fdc) |
Filing 1030 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT M.D. BASCIANI & SONS, INC.'S MOTION FOR RECUSAL AND FOR A STAY OF ALL PROCEEDINGS 1006 IS DENIED. THE CLASS LITIGATION WILL PROCEED TO TRIAL AS SCHEDULED ON 5/20/19. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 5/14/19. 5/14/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 916 ORDER THAT THIS FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER HEREBY INCORPORATES BY REFERENCE THE DEFINITIONS IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CLASS AND CREEKSIDE, AND ALL CAPITALIZED TERMS USED AND NOT OTHERWISE DEFINED HEREIN SHALL HAVE THE MEANINGS SET FORTH IN THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 12/17/18. 12/17/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 813 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF ENTITLEMENT TO IMMUNITY FROM PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE SHERMAN ACT AND FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S 3/2/09 OPINION IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT THAT IS SEEKS SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN DEFENDANTS' FAVOR WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS AGAINST JOHN PIA. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/6/17. 3/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 809 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT'S DISMISSAL OF CLASS REPRESENTATIVE DIVERSIFIED FOODS & SEASONINGS, INC. [DKT.NO.787] IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 2/22/17. 2/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 741 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/5/15. 10/5/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(fdc) |
Filing 724 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/27/15. 8/27/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(fdc) |
Filing 713 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/20/15. 8/20/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(fdc) |
Filing 704 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FILED UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 8/5/15. 8/5/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(fdc) |
Filing 694 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FILED UNDER SEAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 7/29/15. 7/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(fdc) |
Filing 671 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 5/26/15. 5/26/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (FILED UNDER SEAL)(fdc) |
Filing 609 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RECONSIDERATION [#513] IS DENIED TO THE EXTENT THAT IT SEEKS RECONSIDERATION OF MY DECISION OF MARCH 26, 2009. THIS ORDER DENYING RECONSIDERATION OF MY DECISION OF MY DECISION OF MARCH 26, 2009 IS CERTIFIED FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 USC:1292(B) BECAUSE IT INVOLVES CONTROLLING QUESTIONS OF LAW AS TO WHICH THERE IS SUBSTANTIAL GROUND FOR DIFFERENCE OF OPINION AND BECAUSE AN IMMEDIATE APPEAL FROM THIS ORDER MAY MATERIALLY ADVANCE THE ULTIMATE TERMINATION OF THE LITIGATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/14/14. 10/14/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 473 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE OBJECTIONS OF M.D. BASCIANI AND BFI ARE OVERRULED AND THE ORDER DATED 8/21/12 IS AFFIRMED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 10/22/12. 10/22/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.[fdc] |
Filing 400 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL IS GRANTED AND BFI'S MOTION TO QUASH IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 1/31/12. 2/1/12 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Filing 294 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF CAPPER-VOLSTEAD EXEMPTION FILED BY THE EMMC, THE MUSHROOM ALLIANCE, INC., KITHCEN PRIDE MUSHROOMS AND, M.D. BASCIANI & SONS, INC., JM FARMS, FRANKLIN FARMS, INC. ARE DENIED. P LAINTIFFS' CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON THE ISSUE OF CAPPER-VOLSTEAD IMMUNITY IS GRANTED. ALL OTHER MOTIONS TO DISMISS CLAIMS AGAINST INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS UNRELATED TO CAPPER-VOLSTEAD IMMUNITY ARE DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO STRIKE IS DISMISSED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 3/26/09. 3/26/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: IN RE: MUSHROOM DIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.