D'APUZZO v. JOHN DOE NOS. 1 THROUGH 20 et al
RICHARD V. D'APUZZO |
JOHN DOE NOS. 1 THROUGH 20, JANE DOE NOS. 1 THROUGH 20 and SMITHKLINEBEECHAM CORPORATION |
2:2007cv04963 |
November 27, 2007 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
P.I.: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 40 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS IN C.A. 07-4963 IS GRANTED; THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 10/15/2013; 10/16/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3590 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd) |
Filing 36 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IN C.A. 07-4963 IS GRANTED; THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 7/10/2013; 7/11/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 3368 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd) |
Filing 21 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IN C.A. 07-4963 IS GRANTED; THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED AND PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 20 DAYS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 9/7/2011; 9/8/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO LIAISON COUNSEL. (SEE PAPER # 1746 IN 07-MD-1871). (tjd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.