PALADINO v. SIEGEL
Petitioner: CHARLES T. PALADINO
Respondent: BERNARD L. SIEGEL
Case Number: 2:2008cv01533
Filed: March 26, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Habeas Corpus (General) Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: BERLE M. SCHILLER
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 3 OPINION & ORDER, PALADINO'S PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2241 IS DISMISSED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE, AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY KATHARINE SWEENEY HAYDEN ON 7/10/09. 7/13/09 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PALADINO v. SIEGEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CHARLES T. PALADINO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BERNARD L. SIEGEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?