SEBASTIAN v. JOHNSON

Plaintiff: JAMES M. SEBASTIAN
Defendant: CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Case Number: 2:2009cv01404
Filed: April 1, 2009
Court: Pennsylvania Eastern District Court
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Chester
Presiding Judge: LEGROME D. DAVIS
Nature of Suit: Social Security: HIA
Cause of Action: 42:402 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
February 28, 2011 21 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ARE OVERRULED; MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 7 ) IS DENIED AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 9 ) IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 2/28/11. 3/1/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mas, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SEBASTIAN v. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES M. SEBASTIAN
Represented By: DAVID M. HOLLAR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CHARLES E. JOHNSON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.