SIMPSON v. WALMART SUPER STORE et al
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON |
WALMART SUPER STORE, LAW OFFICES OF PALMER, REIPLER & ASSOCIATES, P.A., NANCY A. GILL, PARKSBURG POLICE DEPT., AMBER L. SMITH, ALAN MANNING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, THE SECURITY COMPANY, COATESVILLE POLICE DEPT., MACELROY and THREE JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS |
2:2009cv06144 |
December 28, 2009 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Chester |
JOHN R. PADOVA |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER THAT PLFF'S MOTION TO PROCEED WITH ACTION AND PAY FILING EES IS GRANTED. PLFF MAY PROCEED IWHT THIS ACTION IN FORMA PAUPERIS. THE CLERK SHALL RESTORE THIS CASE TO THE ACTIVE DOCKET. PLFF'S MOTION TO COMMENCE ACTION ON NEW COMPLAINT IS DENIED. THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS, ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 8/5/10. 8/6/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED. (COPY TO PRO SE)(lvj, ) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE PETITION IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO ITS REASSERTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER; IF PLFF FILES WITH THE COURT WITHIN TWENTY DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER A NOTICE THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION,ETC; AND THIS CASE SHALL REMAIN CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 1/22/10. 1/25/10 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED AND FAXED.(lvj, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.