FUREY v. WOLFE et al
| KEVIN FUREY |
| TRAVIS WOLFE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and CHARLES RAMSEY |
| 2:2010cv01820 |
| April 23, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
136
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS' SUBPOENAS TO NORRISTOWN HOSPITAL AND VICKI MORROW, M.D. IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 3/15/12. 3/15/12 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
117
OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. THIS CASE REMAINS REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE HEY FOR FINAL DISPOSITION OF ALL PRETRIAL MATTERS NOT DISPOSITIVE OF A PARTY'S CLAIM OF DEFENSE. THE PARTIES SHALL CONTACT JUDGE HEY TO DISCUSS SCHEDULING THE REMAINDER OF THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN ON 12/27/11. 12/27/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
|
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS SHALL HAVE FOURTEEN DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, OR UNTIL 8/31/11, TO FILE THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 8/17/11. 8/17/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLFF'S COUNSEL IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; DEFTS' REQUEST TO DEPOSE PLFF'S COUNSEL IS GRANTED, BUT SHALL BE STRICTLY LIMITED AS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM; AND THE DISCOVERY ST AY IN EFFECT SINCE MY ORDER DATED 3/8/11 (DOC. NO. 58) IS HEREBY LIFTED. THE PARTIES SHALL CONTACT MY CHAMBERS TO ARRANGE A TELECONFERENCE, ETC.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 5/3/11. 5/4/11 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND INITIAL DISCOVERY ARE GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL REGARDING HIS FOURTH REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IS DENIED AS MOO T. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL REGARDING THE FIFTH REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO QUASH IS DENIED. THE DA'S ASS ERTION OF PRIVILEGE AS TO CERTAIN TESTIMONY BY CHARLES EHRLICH IS GRANTED AS TO THE DELIBERATIVE PROCESS PRIVILEGE ONLY; AND THE DA'S MOTION TO QUASH MR. EHRLICH'S DEPOSITION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY ON 2/18/11. 2/18/11 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
