DEVON IT, INC. et al v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION et al
Plaintiff: DEVON IT (EUROPE), LTD., DEVON IT, INC. and DEVON AD TECH, INC.
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, BERNARD S. MEYERSON, JAMES A. GARGAN, RODNEY C. ADKINS and THOMAS M.S. BRADICICH
Case Number: 2:2010cv02899
Filed: June 16, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: JOEL H. SLOMSKY
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 326 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF MITTS MILAVEC LLC FOR THE APPLICATION OF AN ATTORNEY'S CHARGING LIEN OR, IN THE ALTERNTATIVE THE IMPOSITION OF A CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST IS DENIED. THE CLAIMS OF THE INTERVENORS IN THEIR COMPLAINTS ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO HOLD IN ESCROW PENDING THE RESOLUTION OF THE AMOUNT DUE TO THE INTERVENORS; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 11/21/13. 12/30/13 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
December 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 320 ORDERED THAT THE MITT'S FIRM'S MOTION TO STAY OF THIS COURT'S 11/21/2013 OPINION AND ORDER AND FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURES 52, 59 AND 60 (DOC. NO. 314 ) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 12/20/2013. 12/20/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 306 ORDERED THAT THE MOTION OF MITTS MILAVEC LLC FOR THE APPLICATION OF AN ATTORNEY'S CHARGING LIEN OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE THE IMPOSITION OF A CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST 144 IS DENIED. THE CLAIMS OF THE INTERVENORS IN THEIR COMPLAINT DOC. NOS. 271 , [273 ], 276 ARE GRANTED AND THE INTERVENORS WILL BE PAID FOR SERVICES RENDERED FROM DECEMBER 27, 2011 TO MARCH 2013 WHEN THE INTERVENORS CEASED WORKING ON BEHALF OF DEVON. ETC.. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED IS DIRECTED TO HOLD THE $4.1 MILLION IN ESCROW PENDING THE RESOLUTION OF THE AMOUNT DUE TO THE INTERVENORS. A FURTURE FINAL ORDER WILL BE ENTERED DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO DISTRIBUTE THE $4.1 MILLION IN ESCROW FUNDS TO THE INTERVENORS AND DEVON AFTER THE AMOUNT DUE TO THE INTERVENORS IS FINALIZED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 11/21/2013. 11/22/2013 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg )
March 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DIMISSS IS GRANTED IN PART AND COUNTS III, VIII, AND IX ARE DISMISSED. DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED AS TO COUNTS I, II, IV, V, VI, AND VII. DEFENDANTS ARE ORDERED TO FILE AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT WITH 20 DAYS OF THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 3/31/2011. 4/1/2011 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DEVON IT, INC. et al v. INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Represented By: ROBERT N. FELTOON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BERNARD S. MEYERSON
Represented By: ROBERT N. FELTOON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JAMES A. GARGAN
Represented By: ROBERT N. FELTOON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RODNEY C. ADKINS
Represented By: ROBERT N. FELTOON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: THOMAS M.S. BRADICICH
Represented By: TIMOTHY K. LEWIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEVON IT (EUROPE), LTD.
Represented By: AMY L. BLACKMORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEVON IT, INC.
Represented By: AMY L. BLACKMORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DEVON AD TECH, INC.
Represented By: AMY L. BLACKMORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?