TAHA v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP et al
| DARYOUSH TAHA |
| BENSALEM TOWNSHIP, STEVEN MORAN, CHRISTOPHER M. BARRY, SR. and CHING-O-CHANG, LLC |
| 2:2012cv06867 |
| December 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
432
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF IS AWARDED DAMAGES AGAINST DEFENDANT MUGSHOTS.COM, LLC AND UNPUBLISH LLC d/b/a MUGSHOTS.COM, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $150,000 AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO TERMINATE THIS CASE AND MARK AS CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/12/21. 2/12/21 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(JL)
|
|
Filing
427
ORDER THAT THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IS APPROVED AND SHALL BE EFFECTUATED BY THE PARTIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITS TERMS; THE MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (ECF NO. 393 ) IS GRANTED; THE MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE AWARD (ECF NO. 395 ) IS GRANTED; THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO DEFENDANTS BUCKS COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA AND BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY; AND THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL ENTER THIS FINAL JUDGMENT FORTHWITH AND TERMINATE DEFENDANTS BUCKS COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA AND BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FROM THIS CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 11/30/2020. 11/30/2020 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED AND E-MAILED.(nd, )
|
|
Filing
370
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS RENEWED MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW OR FOR A NEW TRIAL AND MOTION TO ALTER JUDGMENT ARE DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 10/4/19. 10/4/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED. (JL)
|
|
Filing
284
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE THE EXPERT REPORT AND PRECLUDE TESTIMONY OF SARAH LAGESON AND RICHARD SUBIA. THE MOTION AS TO LAGESON IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION AS TO SUBIA IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 4/29/19. 4/29/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
268
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 2/14/19. 2/14/19 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
158
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION IS GRANTED. DARYOUSH TAHA IS APPOINTED CLASS REPRESENTATIVE. SEEGER WEISS LLP AND ABRAMSON & DENEBERG P.C. ARE APPOINTED CLASS COUNSEL; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 5/4/16. 5/4/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/28/16. 3/28/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, MAILED TO UNREP.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
140
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF CITIZEN INFORMATION ASSOCIATES, LLC FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED AND CIA IS DISMISSED AS A DEFENDANT TO THIS ACTION; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 12/30/15. 12/30/15 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT CITIZEN INFORMATION ASSOCIATES (CIA)'S MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE L. FELIPE RESTREPO ON 3/25/14. 3/26/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS, E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
