PRILLERMAN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
FRANKLYN DEVON PRILLERMAN |
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILA COMMISSIONER OF PRISONERS, WARDEN CURRAN FRUMOLD, C.O. SAM, COLEMAN, LYNCH and MELTON |
2:2013cv01414 |
March 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 78 ORDERED THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 71 , 74 ) IS GRANTED. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 11/4/2019. 11/5/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND COUNSEL AND E-MAILED.(sg, ) |
Filing 64 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 60) IS GRANTED. PLFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 51) IS DENIED AS THERE IS NO BASIS FOR LIABILITY AGAINST COMMISSIONER GIORLA. PLFF'S MOTION FOR COURT TO CALL WITNESS ES AT REQUEST OF PLFF. (DOC. NO. 52) IS DENIED AS THE COURT HAS BASED ITS SUMMARY JUDGMENT RULING ON FACTS AS STIPULATED BY THE PARTIES. THE CLERK IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THE CASE.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 8/10/16. 8/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., MAILED AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN. Modified on 8/11/2016 (pr, ). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.