ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED v. A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC.
| ALLIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED |
| A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC. |
| 2:2013cv02510 |
| May 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
279
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT INTERVENOR LEENA KHOSLA'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING PRIORITY OF DISTRIBUTION [ECF 235] IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 5/3/16. 5/3/16 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) Modified on 5/3/16 (fdc).
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 8/19/2015. 8/19/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
|
|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT FOLLOWING EXTENSIVE BRIEFING AND A HEARING ON 3/31/15, THE COURT WILL GRANT A-1'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION TESTIMONY (ECF 95 & 96) BECAUSE PLAINTIFFS HAVE NOT MET THEIR BURDEN OF SHOWING THAT AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVI LEGE EXISTED AS TO THE COMMUNICATIONS WITH MR. MASSIAS AND MR. BULLOCK, WHOSE DEPOSITIONS HAVE BEEN NOTICED IN THIS CASE, AND MR. DANGE. THEREFORE, MR. MASSIAS AND MR. BULLOCK ARE ORDERED TO GIVE TESTIMONY AT THEIR DEPOSITIONS CONCERNING COMMUNICATIO NS AND TRANSACTIONS BETWEEN AND AMONG THE PRINCIPALS IN THIS CASE, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO PLAINTIFFS' ABILITY TO NOTE OBJECTIONS FOR THE RECORD AND TO RENEW ARGUMENT AT SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR AT TRIAL THAT ATTORNEY TESTIMONY OR COMMUNICATIONS SHOULD BE REGARDED AS PRIVILEGED. THE COURT WILL DENY A-1'S MOTION TO COMPEL AS TO MS. BARROUCHE. AS TO A-1'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY (ECF 133 & 134), AT THE 3/31/15, HEARING, COUNSEL FOR A-1 AND PLAINTIFFS INDICATED THAT THEY HAD RESOLVED SOME OF THE DISPUTES AT ISSUE, BUT THAT THEY HAD BEEN UNABLE TO REACH A RESOLUTION REGARDING TWO MATTERS: (1) PLAINTIFFS' INSTRUCTION TO KUMAR AND SAMEER AT THEIR DEPOSITIONS NOT TO ANSWER CERTAIN QUESTIONS ON RELEVANCE GROUNDS AND (2) PLAINTIFFS� 39; REFUSAL TO PRODUCE CERTAIN SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR PLAINTIFFS' FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. AS INDICATED AT THE HEARING, THE COURT WILL GRANT A-1'S MOTION TO COMPEL AS FOLLOWS: PLAINTIFFS SHALL NOT INSTRUCT KUMAR AND SAMEER NOT TO ANSWER QUESTIONS, ON RELEVANCE GROUNDS, CONCERNING THE DEFENSE THAT KUMAR AND SURESH HAD AGREEED TO CAUSE PLAINTIFFS TO EXTINGUISH THE LEASES IN CONNECTION WITH A LARGER BUSINESS RESTRUCTURING. ANY ADDITIONAL DEPOSITION OF KUMAR AND SAMEER SHALL BE LIMITED TO 90 MINUTES. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION FOR THOSE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PLAINTIFFS HAVE PRODUCED IN THIS CASE IS DISCOVERABLE AND SHALL BE PRODUCED BY PLAINTIFFS. A-1 WILL PAY THE COST OF THE PRODUCTION OF THESE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/8/15. 4/8/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/11/14. 9/12/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
50
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT A PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS SET FOR 6/12/14 AT 4:00 PM IN COURTROOM 3A BEFORE HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS, INCLUDING MATERIAL SUBMITTED UNDER RULE 44.1, SHALL BE FILED NO LATER THAN 10/15/14. DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 9/30/2014. THE NON-JURY TRIAL WILL START ON MONDAY, 12/8/14 AT 9:00 AM IN COURTROOM 3A, ASSUMING ISSUES REMAIN FOR TRIAL. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/30/14. 5/1/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR STAY PURSUANT TO PRINCIPLES OF INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE AND THE DOCTRINE FROM NON CONVENIENS IS DENIED, SUBJECT TO RENEWAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE IF MATERIAL CIRCUMSTANCES CHANGE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/12/14. 3/12/14 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
