FIGUEROA v. WERNEROWICZ et al
MOLLO FIGUEROA |
MICHAEL WERNEROWICZ, THE ATTORNEY GNERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA |
2:2013cv02687 |
May 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Philadelphia |
M. FAITH ANGELL |
PAUL S. DIAMOND |
Habeas Corpus: (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED. A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS MATTER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 2/16/18. 2/16/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd ) |
Filing 9 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR STAY IS GRANTED; THE PETITION UNDER 28 USC, SECTION 2254 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS STAYED AND HELD IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE CONCLUSION OF PETITIONER'S STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. PETITIONER SHALL RETURN TO FEDERAL COURT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FOLLOWING THE CONCLUSION OF HIS STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS. PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, ETC. THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 7/29/13. 7/30/13 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.