TOSCANO v. NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION et al
| KENNETH R. TOSCANO |
| NATIONAL AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION and EVERCORE TRUST COMPANY |
| 2:2014cv00763 |
| February 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| NORMA L. SHAPIRO |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 25) IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 8/24/2015. 8/24/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(lbs, )
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 3 ) IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED; THE PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE A PERIOD OF FOURTEEN (14) DAYS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IF THE PLAINTIFF BELIEVES HE CAN REMEDY THE DEFICIENCIES NOTED IN THE ACCOMPANY ING MEMORANDUM OPINION; AND IF THE PLAINTIFF DOES NOT FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN 14 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL DIRECT THE CLERK OF COURT TO MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER NOTICE TO THE PARTIES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 3/24/15. 3/24/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (mas, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
