CORRIGAN v. LOCAL 6, BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY AND TOBACCO WORKERS

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District CORRIGAN v. LOCAL 6, BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY AND TOBACCO WORKERS

CORRIGAN v. LOCAL 6, BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY AND TOBACCO WORKERS

Plaintiff:	TERRANCE HENRY CORRIGAN, III
Defendant:	LOCAL 6, BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY AND TOBACCO WORKERS
Case Number:	2:2014cv01073
Filed:	February 21, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Nature of Suit:	Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 4, 2015	Filing 72 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANT INDEPENDENCE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT UNION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT INDEPENDENCE'S AMENDED MOTION TO DI SMISS AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF ARE DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT UNION'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND EXTEND DISCOVERY, AND TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ARE DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 3/4/2015. 3/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Date Filed

Document Text

March 4, 2015

Filing 72 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. DEFENDANT INDEPENDENCE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT UNION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT INDEPENDENCE'S AMENDED MOTION TO DI SMISS AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF ARE DENIED AS MOOT. DEFENDANT UNION'S MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER IS DENIED AS MOOT. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT AND EXTEND DISCOVERY, AND TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ARE DENIED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 3/4/2015. 3/4/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CORRIGAN v. LOCAL 6, BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY AND TOBACCO WORKERS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: TERRANCE HENRY CORRIGAN, III
Represented By:	GEORGE R. SZYMANSKI
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: LOCAL 6, BAKERY, CONFECTIONARY AND TOBACCO WORKERS
Represented By:	NANCY B.G. LASSEN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?