FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: CHAKA FATTAH, JR.
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Case Number: 2:2014cv01092
Filed: February 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER DENYING 97 MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 1/2/20. 1/3/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED. (va, )
May 17, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER THAT DEFTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 46) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: TO THE EXTENT THE MOTION SEEKS JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE U.S. ON CLAIMS FOR A TAX REFUND, IT IS GRANTED; TO THE EXTENT THE MOTION SEEKS A JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF THE U.S. ON THE WRONGFUL DISCLOSURE CLAIM, IT IS DENIED; AND JUDGMENT WILL BE ENTERED UPON CONCLUSION OF THE TRIAL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 5/17/17. 5/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(pr, )
August 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 14) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. THE DEFENDANTS FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ARE DISMISSED AS DEFENDANTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 8/27/2014. 8/28/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED; AND MAILED TO PRO SE. (ems)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FATTAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHAKA FATTAH, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?