T.I.B.C. PARTNERS, LP et al v. THE CITY OF CHESTER et al
| T.I.B.C. PARTNERS, LP, T.I.B.C. DEPOT PARTNERS, LP, T.I.B. PARTNERS, LP and T.I.B.C. BAY PARTNERS, LP |
| THE CITY OF CHESTER, JOHN A. LINDER, JOSEPH BAIL, JR., KEYSTONE SPORTS AND ENTERTAINMENTS, LLC, FC PENNSYLVANIA STADIUM LLC, PENNSYLVANIA PROFESSIONAL SOCCER, LLC, GLOBAL SPECTRUM, INC., DAVID P. DEBUSSCHERE and MICHAEL SCANLON |
| 2:2014cv03697 |
| June 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| EDMUND V. LUDWIG |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS ARE GRANTED SUCH THAT ALL CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 1/29/18. 1/30/18 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER THAT THE MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 12 (b)(6) ARE GRANTED. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TERMINATE THE CITY OF CHESTER AND JOHN A. LINDER AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS CASE BECAUSE ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THESE TWO DEFENDANTS HAVE BEEN DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG ON 4/19/16. 4/19/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
