LEAF v. COLEMAN et al

LEAF v. COLEMAN et al

Petitioner:	FAHEEM LEAF
Respondent:	BRIAN COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number:	2:2014cv04126
Filed:	July 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Philadelphia
Presiding Judge:	JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 20, 2016	Filing 22 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA K. CARACAPPA ARE OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA K. CARACAPPA IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS COPRUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, BECAUSE NO REASONABLE JURIST COULD FIND THIS RULING DEBATABLE AND BECAUSE THER E HAS BEEN NO SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 10/18/2016. 10/20/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 20, 2016

Filing 22 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA K. CARACAPPA ARE OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE LINDA K. CARACAPPA IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS COPRUS BY A PERSON IN STATE CUSTODY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT, BECAUSE NO REASONABLE JURIST COULD FIND THIS RULING DEBATABLE AND BECAUSE THER E HAS BEEN NO SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAMES KNOLL GARDNER ON 10/18/2016. 10/20/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED.(lbs, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LEAF v. COLEMAN et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: FAHEEM LEAF
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: BRIAN COLEMAN
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?