TIMONEY v. LOUGHERY et al
| JOSEPH TIMONEY, JR. |
| WILLIAM LOUGHERY, JENNIFER LOUGHERY, STEPHEN HOWARD, UPPER GWYNEDD TOWNSHIP, EDWARD TARTAR and JOHN DOES 1-10 |
| 2:2014cv04774 |
| August 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS WILLIAM LOUGHERY AND JENNIFER LOUGHERY FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. #58 AND DOC. #60) WITH RESPECT TO ALL FEDERAL CLAIMS UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 IS GRANTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 7/7/15. 7/7/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANT STEPHEN HOWARD, ESQUIRE FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS GRANTED; AND COUNT ONE OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED INSOFAR AS IT ALLEGES LIABILITY AGAINST DEFENDANT STEPHEN HOWARD, ESQUIRE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 3/18/15. 3/18/15 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
|
|
Filing
21
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF DEFENDANTS UPPER GWYNEDD TOWNSHIP AND EDWARD TARTAR FOR DISMISSAL OF THE CLAIMS AGAINST THEM (DOC. NO. 15 ), IS GRANTED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 12/19/2014. 12/19/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO UNREPS AND E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
