LACEY v. SANDUSKY et al
| WILLIAM PERRY LACEY |
| PENN STATE COLLEGE and JERRY SANDUSKY |
| 2:2014cv05067 |
| September 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Centre |
| TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
6
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION ORDER THAT LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS GRANTED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1915. THE PLAINTIFF SHALL PAY THE FILING FEE OF $350. THE PLAINTIFF IS ASSESSED AN INITIAL FILING FEE OF $31.67; ETC.. PLAINTIF F'S COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO FORWARD COPIES OF THIS ORDER TO THE WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FORT WORTH AND THE PLAINTIFF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 10/1/2014. 10/2/2014 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE; COPY FORWARDED TO THE WARDEN OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FORT WORTH. (ems)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; IF PETITIONER FILES WITH THE CLERK OF COURT WITHIN TWENTY (20) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER A NOTICE THAT HE WISHES TO PROCEED WITH THIS ACTION AND OBLIGATES HIMSELF TO PAY THE $350.00 FILING FEE, THIS ACTION WILL BE REINSTED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 9/9/14. 9/10/14 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER. (jpd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
