GAUCHE v. MAHALLY et al
| JOEL GAUCHE |
| MR. MAHALLY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
| 2:2014cv05181 |
| September 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Bucks |
| PAUL S. DIAMOND |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA AND PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS, IT IS ORDERED THAT MY ORDER OF JUNE 15, 2015 15 IS VACATED. PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS 16 ARE OVERRULED. THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, THERE ARE NO GROUNDS TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK SHALL MARK THIS CASE AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 6/17/15. 6/18/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, AND AFTER REVIEW OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CARACAPPA, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 13 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 1 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. BECAUSE PETITIONER HAS NOT MADE A SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, THERE ARE NO GROUNDS TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 6/15/15. 6/15/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(gs)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
