MASON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
| FLORENCE ELIZABETH MASON |
| COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA CITY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2014cv05640 |
| October 1, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| EDWARD G. SMITH |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS INSOFAR AS IT RECOMMENDS THAT THE COURT DISMISS THE PETITION FOR THE FAILURE TO EXHAUST STATE REMEDIES, ETC. THE OBJECTIONS AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE REPORT AND RECOM MENDATION (DOC. NO. 22) ARE OVERRULED; AND THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE PETITIONER TO REFILE ONCE SHE HAS EXHAUSTED HER STATE REMEDIES; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 12/30/15. 12/30/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'. (ky, )
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION/ORDER THAT FOR THE REASONS SET FORTH IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE MOTION (DOC. NO. 3) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/28/15. 9/28/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE'. (ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
