MONARCH et al v. GORMAN et al
Plaintiff: JOHN C. MONARCH and DIRECT OUTBOUND SERVICES LLC
Defendant: RICHARD A. GORMAN, GORMAN ECONOMICS, LLC, VANGUARD ECONOMICS, LLC, AT COST NUTRACEUTICALS, LLC, BRAND.COM, INC., JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and JOHN DOE 3
Case Number: 2:2014cv05980
Filed: October 21, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Presiding Judge: THOMAS N. ONEILL
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE OR OTHER RELIEF IN AID OF SETTLEMENT IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THIS CASE IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41.1(b). THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS FILE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 9/11/2017. 9/11/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E-MAILED.(sg, )
September 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 115 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR "FALSE LIGHT" INVASION OF PRIVACY IN COUNT II OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR "WRONGFUL APPROPRIATION OF PERSONALITY&q uot; IN COUNT III OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR "WRONGFUL PUBLICIZING OF PRIVATE AFFAIRS" IN COUNT IV OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED, WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR "AIDING AND ABETTING" IN COUNT VI OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. DEFENDANT GORMAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR "FRAUDULENT TRANSFER" IN COUNT VIII OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DENIED. PLAI NTIFFS' CLAIM FOR "ALTER EGO" IN COUNT IX OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. PLAINTIFFS' CLAIM FOR PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION IN COUNT X OF THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 9/22/15. 9/22/15 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MONARCH et al v. GORMAN et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN C. MONARCH
Represented By: MATTHEW A. GLAZER
Represented By: DANIEL R. WARNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DIRECT OUTBOUND SERVICES LLC
Represented By: MATTHEW A. GLAZER
Represented By: DANIEL R. WARNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICHARD A. GORMAN
Represented By: WILLIAM H. CATTO
Represented By: SEAN R. RILEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GORMAN ECONOMICS, LLC
Represented By: DAVID H. PITTINSKY
Represented By: BURT M. RUBLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VANGUARD ECONOMICS, LLC
Represented By: JAMES L. BARLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT COST NUTRACEUTICALS, LLC
Represented By: DAVID H. PITTINSKY
Represented By: BURT M. RUBLIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRAND.COM, INC.
Represented By: JONATHON E. CROSS
Represented By: DAVID J. SHANNON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE 1
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE 2
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE 3
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?