STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. TOLL BROTHERS, INC. et al
| STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY |
| TOLL BROTHERS, INC., BROTHERS, INC., BROTHER'S ELECTRIC, INC., HARTMAN CONTRACTORS, JOHN GRIMLEY and ANTHONY ELECTRIC |
| 2:2014cv06535 |
| November 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| JAN E. DUBOIS |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
97
ORDER THAT DEFT JOHN GRIMLEY'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALL AND/OR SOME OF THE DAMAGES CLAIMED BY PLFF IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT COUNSEL SHALL SUBMIT A JOINT STATUS REPORT TO THE COURT ON OR BEFORE 12/22/2017, ADVISING WHETHER THE CASE IS SETTLED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/7/17. 12/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER THAT MOTION IN LIMINE OF DEFT JOHN GRIMLEY TO PRECLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF PLFF'S EXPERT WITNESS MICHAEL WALD IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART, ETC. DEFT JOHN GRIMLEY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ON OR BEFORE 6/15/2017, COUNSEL SHALL JOINTLY REPORT TO THE COURT WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER THE CASE IS SETTLED, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 5/17/17. 5/18/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
