LAZAR v. COLEMAN et al
STEVEN LAZAR |
BRIAN V. COLEMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA |
2:2014cv06907 |
December 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Favette |
M. FAITH ANGELL |
GERALD A. MCHUGH |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER 60 B FROM FINAL ORDER AND JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. THIS COURT'S ORDER OF 3/1/17, DENYING RELIEF UNDER 28 U.S.C. &2254 IS HEREBY VACATED. FOLLOWING RECONSIDERATION BASED UPON AN UNTAINTED RECORD, THE AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, IS GRANTED AS TO THE CLAIMS ONE,TWO AND FOUR. PETITIONER MUST BE RETRIED WITHIN 180 DAYS OR RELEASED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 3/6/23. 3/6/23 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Filing 47 ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60 (b) IS GRANTED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 8/24/22. 8/24/22 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(JL) |
Filing 26 ORDER THAT THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY IS ISSUED AS TO WHETHER UNDER 28 U.S.C. SEC. 2254(d)(1), THE STATE COURTS UNREASONABLY APPLIED THE PREJUDICE PRONG OF STICKLAND v. WASHINGTON, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 3/1/17. 3/1/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.