ADENIYI-JONES et al v. STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
| SUSAN ADENIYI-JONES and ABRAHAM K. MUNABI |
| STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 2:2014cv07101 |
| December 16, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| HARVEY BARTLE |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT RHONDA HILL WILSON, ESQ IS DISQUALIFIED AS TRIAL COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS SUSAN ADENIYI-JONES AND ABRAHAM K. MUNABI. CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO PLACE THIS CASE IN CIVIL SUSPENSE. PLAINTIFFS SHALL ON OR BEFORE 8/1/16 SHALL E ITHER CAUSE NEW TRIAL COUNSEL TO ENTER AN APPEARANCE ON THEIR BEHALF OR ADVISE THE COURT IN WRITING THAT THEY WISH TO PROCEED AT TRIAL WITHOUT COUNSEL, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 6/30/16. 6/30/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFFS, EMAILED.(rf, ) Modified on 6/30/2016 (rf, ).
|
|
Filing
49
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT MOTION OF DEFENDANT STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY TO COMPEL THE DEPOSITION OF RHONDA HILL WILSON (DOC. 40) IS GRANTED, LIMITED TO WILSON'S COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE DEFENDANT REGARDING THE PLAINTIFF'S PRE-LITIGATION INSURANCE CLAIM AND THE MOTION OF PLAINTIFFS SUSAN ADENIYI-JONES AND ABRAHAM K. MUNABI FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (DOC. 42) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III ON 10/21/15. 10/21/15 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
