NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Respondent: ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Movant: GARY S. ROWLES, JR., LINDA S. PALCZUK, MATTHEW R. DIGGONS, TERRI L. BOWMAN, RICHARD S. BARKER, JEFFREY A. POTT and STEVEN J. ROTHWEIN
Case Number: 2:2014mc00225
Filed: September 17, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: PAUL S. DIAMOND
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: Motion to Quash
Jury Demanded By: None
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: GARY S. ROWLES, JR.
Represented By: MICHAEL P. KELLY
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: LINDA S. PALCZUK
Represented By: MICHAEL P. KELLY
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: MATTHEW R. DIGGONS
Represented By: MICHAEL P. KELLY
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: TERRI L. BOWMAN
Represented By: MICHAEL P. KELLY
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: RICHARD S. BARKER
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Represented By: MICHAEL P. KELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: JEFFREY A. POTT
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Represented By: MICHAEL P. KELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: STEVEN J. ROTHWEIN
Represented By: JOSHUA H. ROBERTS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ALL PLAINTIFFS IN IN RE NEXIUM (ESOMEPRAZOLE MAGNESIUM) ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MDL NO. 2409
Represented By: ELLEN T. NOTEWARE
Represented By: DAVID F. SORENSEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?