SCOTT v. FRED BEANS CHEVROLET OF LIMERICK, INC. et al
Plaintiff: ALICIA SCOTT
Defendant: FRED BEANS CHEVROLET OF LIMERICK, INC., TIMOTHY E. DEJESUS, MATTHEW D. DYMIT and JOHN DOE TOE COMPANY
Case Number: 2:2015cv01071
Filed: March 3, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: RONALD L. BUCKWALTER
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1691 Equal Credit Opportunity Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF ALICIA SCOTT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SCOTTS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO DEFENDANT BEAN'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT. DEFENDANT BEAN'S COUNTERCLAIM FO R BREACH OF CONTRACT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. SCOTTS MOTION IS DENIED AS TO HER EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITY ACT CLAIM 15 U.S.C.. 1691 AND UNIFORM COMMERICAL CODE CLAIM. DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS GRANTED. SCOTTS EQUAL CREDIT OPPORTUNI TY ACT 15 U.S.C. 1691 PENNSYLVANIA UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES AND CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW AND CONVERSION CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT BEANS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, ETC. PLAINTIFFS UTPCPL CLAIM AGAINST TIMOTHY E. DEJESUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. TI MOTHY E. DEJESUS IS DISMISSED FROM THIS CASE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS DEFENDANT TERMINATED. CASE IS REFERRED TO HONORABL JACOB P. HART TO ATTEMTP TO RESOLVE THE REMAINING CLAIM IN THIS MATTER. PARTIES SHALL COOPERATE WITH JUDGE HART'S INSTRUCTIONS. FURTHER PROCEEDINGS ARE STAYED PENDING THE OUTCOME OF THE MEDIATION WITH JUDGE HART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE STEWART DALZELL ON 4/28/16. 4/29/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCOTT v. FRED BEANS CHEVROLET OF LIMERICK, INC. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALICIA SCOTT
Represented By: ROBERT P. COCCO
Represented By: MATTHEW B. WEISBERG
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRED BEANS CHEVROLET OF LIMERICK, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIMOTHY E. DEJESUS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MATTHEW D. DYMIT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE TOE COMPANY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?