MORALES v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
| ANTONIO JAVIER MORALES |
| CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE and PHILADELPHIA CORRECTIONS OFFICER JOHN DOE |
| 2:2015cv01318 |
| March 13, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| CYNTHIA M. RUFE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 18 ), IS GRANTED AND THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY, WHICH ARE SET FORTH IN COUNT II OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, ARE DISMISSED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO TE RMINATE THE CITY AS A PARTY. WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER, PLAINTIFF SHALL PROVIDE THE COURT WITH A STATUS REPORT WITH REGARD TO HIS INTENT TO PURSUE HIS CLAIMS AGAINST THE JOHN DOE DEFENDANTS, WHO HAVE NOT YET BEEN IDENTIFIED OR SERVED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 1/7/2016. 1/8/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE CLAIMS ASSERTED AGAINST IT IN THE COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS GRANTED AND ALL CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT NO LATER THAN 7/2/2015. SIGNED BY HONORABLE CYNTHIA M. RUFE ON 6/11/2015. 6/12/2015 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
