MORRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Justia Dockets & Filings Third Circuit Pennsylvania Eastern District MORRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

MORRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

Petitioner:	ERNEST MORRIS
Respondent:	COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number:	2:2015cv01352
Filed:	March 18, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office:	Philadelphia Office
County:	Northumberland
Presiding Judge:	RICHARD A. LLORET
Presiding Judge:	C. DARNELL JONES
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 29, 2018	Filing 49 ORDER THAT MOVANT'S RULE 60 MOTION (ECF NO. 47) IS DENIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM/OPINION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 10/29/18. 10/29/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
January 24, 2017	Filing 36 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM AND THE CAVEAT CONTAINED THEREIN AT SECTION IV(B)(5); PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PETITIONER'S RENEWED REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS DENIED AS MOOT; NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2253(C)(1)(A) ETC. AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/24/17. 1/24/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Date Filed

Document Text

October 29, 2018

Filing 49 ORDER THAT MOVANT'S RULE 60 MOTION (ECF NO. 47) IS DENIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM/OPINION.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 10/29/18. 10/29/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

January 24, 2017

Filing 36 ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED AS SET FORTH IN THIS COURT'S ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM AND THE CAVEAT CONTAINED THEREIN AT SECTION IV(B)(5); PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; PETITIONER'S RENEWED REQUEST FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING IS DENIED AS MOOT; NO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL ISSUE UNDER 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2253(C)(1)(A) ETC. AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 1/24/17. 1/24/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PETITIONER, EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MORRIS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: ERNEST MORRIS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?