RAMEY v. GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
| ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY |
| GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTER, JOHN A. REILLY, JR., DONNA MELLOW, RONALD PHILLIPS, N. SMITH and E. ASANTE |
| 2:2015cv01461 |
| March 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| EDWARD G. SMITH |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER THAT THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 34) IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM AGAINST THE DEFENDANT, KELLY MULLAN, IS DISMISSED UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B). JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT, RONALD PHILLIPS, AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF, ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 10/11/16. 10/11/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER THE APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (DOC. NO. 1) IS GRANTED. THE PLAINTIFF, ROBERT MARQUIS RAMEY, #HZ-7999, SHALL PAY THE FULL FILING FEE OF $350 IN INSTALLMENTS AS REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(B). BASED ON THE FINANCI AL INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE PLAINTIFF, HE IS ASSESSED AN INITIAL PARTIAL FILING FEE OF $19.22. THE SUPERINTENDENT OR OTHER APPROPRIATE OFFICIAL AT THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD OR AT ANY OTHER PRISON AT WHICH THE PLAINTI FF MAY BE INCARCERATED IS DIRECTED TO DEDUCT $19.22 FROM THE PLAINTIFF'S INMATE TRUST FUND ACCOUNT, WHEN SUCH FUNDS BECOME AVAILABLE, AND FORWARD THAT AMOUNT TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PE NNSYLVANIA, 601 MARKET STREET, ROOM 2609, PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106, TO BE CREDITED TO CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-1461, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO THE SUPERINTENDENT OF THE STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT GRATERFORD. THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED FOR THE FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B)(II) AS FOLLOWS: A. THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; B. THE CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS MOOT; C. THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS BASED UPON AN ALLEGED FAILURE TO HAVE A LADDER FOR THE PLAINTIFF'S BUNK BED ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; AND D. THE CLAIMS AGAINST COMMUNITY EDUCATIO N CENTER ("CEC"), JOHN A. REILLY, JR., DONNA MELLOW, DR. RONALD PHILLIPS, "N. SMITH," AND "E. ASANTE" ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE WITH LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 5 OF THIS ORDER.T HE PLAINTIFF HAS LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. IF THE PLAINTIFF FILES AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, HE SHALL NAME ALL DEFENDANTS IN THE CAPTION OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AND IN THE BODY OF THE AMENDED CO MPLAINT. UPON THE FILING OF AN AMENDED COMPLAINT, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL NOT ISSUE SUMMONS OR MAKE SERVICE UNTIL SO ORDERED BY THE COURT. IF THE PLAINTIFF FAILS TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS ORDER, THE COURT WILL DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE HIS CLAIMS WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO THE PARTIES; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/29/15. 4/29/15 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF, MAILED TO WARDEN OF GRATERFORD. (er, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
