CRAWFORD v. UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: CARL CRAWFORD
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Case Number: 2:2015cv02643
Filed: May 1, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Outside the State of PA.
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDERED THAT THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY WITHOUT PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO THE COURTS SCREENING AUTHORITY UNDER § 1915(E)(2)(B) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM FOR RELIEF; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF MAY SUBMIT AN AMENDED C OMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS; TO THE EXTENT PLAINTIFF DOES NOT SUBMIT AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS, THIS DISMISSAL WILL AUTOMATICALLY CONVERT TO A DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF THE COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER TO PLAINTIFF AT THE ADDRESS ON FILE AND CLOSE THIS CASE ACCORDINGLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE FREDA L. WOLFSON ON 1/21/20. 1/22/20 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd )
October 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER THAT PLFF'S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (ECF NO. 8) IS GRANTED; THE CLERK SHALL REOPEN THIS CASE; THE COMPLAINT SHALL BE FILED AND SUMMONS SHALL NOT ISSUE AT THIS TIME, AS THE COURT HAS NOT YET COMPLETED ITS SUA SPONTE SCREENI NG; THE TIME TO SERVE PROCESS UNDER FRCP 4(m) IS HEREBY EXTENDED TO NINETY (90) DAYS AFTER THE COURT PERMITS THE COMPLAINT TO PROCEED; IT IS ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SERVE A COPY OF THIS ORDER BY REGULAR U.S. MAIL UPON THE WARDEN OF FCI- PETERSBURG AND THE OFFICE OF THE U.S. ATTORNEY FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PA; ORDERED THAT THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL SEND A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO PLFF. BY REGULAR U.S. MAIL.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE FREDA L. WOLFSON ON 10/22/18. 10/22/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF., WARDEN OF FCI-PETERSBURG, AND U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF EDPA. (pr, )
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER THAT THE CLERK SHALL ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE THIS CASE; PLFF. MAY HAVE THE ABOVE ENTITLED CASE REOPENED, IF, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THE DATE OF ENTRY OF THIS ORDER, PLFF. EITHER PRE-PAYS THE $400 FILING FEE OR SUBMITS TO THE CLERK A COMPLETE SIGNED IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION, INCLUDING A CERTIFIED SIX-MONTH PRISON ACCOUNT STATEMENT; ORDERED THAT THE CLERK SHALL SERVE ON PLFF. BY REGULAR U.S. MAIL THIS ORDER AND THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OPINION; AND A BLANK APPLICATION FOR PRISONERS TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE FREDA L. WOLFSON ON 3/19/18. 3/20/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF. WITH A BLANK COPY OF IFP FORM, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CRAWFORD v. UNITED STATES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CARL CRAWFORD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Represented By: JOHN T. CRUTCHLOW
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?