PIZARRO v. COLVIN
Plaintiff: PATRIA PIZARRO
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Case Number: 2:2015cv02644
Filed: May 12, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Office: Philadelphia Office
County: Philadelphia
Presiding Judge: NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT ON OBJECTIONS TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 18 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 9/21/16. 9/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: PIZARRO v. COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRIA PIZARRO
Represented By: ROBERT J. LUKENS
Represented By: JONATHAN M. STEIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CAROLYN COLVIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?