PORTLAND MINT et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY et al
PORTLAND MINT and RONNIE SHAHAR |
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF THE MINT, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SERVICE, JACOB J. LEW, RHETT JEPPSON, JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, R. GIL KERLIKOWSKE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
2:2016cv00270 |
January 22, 2016 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
05 U.S.C. ยง 702 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [ECF 24] IS GRANTED. COUNTS I,IV, AND V OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. COUNTS II AND III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, T HE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, THE UNITED STATES MINT, THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, THE UNITED STATES BUREAU OF CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION SERVICE, STEVEN MNUCHIN, DAVID MOTL, JOHN F. KELLY, AND KEVIN K. MCALEENAN A RE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; COUNTS II AND III AGAINST JOHN DOES 1-10 ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFFS ARE GRANTED LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING OPINION NO LATER THAN 4/3/17. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/20/17. 3/20/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.