VAN DE KAMP et al v. TRANSDERMAL SPECIALTIES, INC. et al
| THEODORE J. VAN DE KAMP and PATRICIA VAN DER KAMP |
| TRANSDERMAL SPECIALTIES, INC., BRUCE K. REDDING, JR., BRUCE K. REDDING, JR. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY TRUST and TRANSDERMAL SPECIALTIES GLOBAL, INC. |
| 2:2016cv02768 |
| June 6, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Delaware |
| LEGROME D. DAVIS |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE LAY OPINION TESTIMONY BY BRUCE REDDING IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OULTINED HEREIN. ON OR BEFORE 12/28/2018 MR. REDDING WILL SUPPLY AN AFFIDAVIT DETAILING THE EVIDENCE, REASONING AND CONCLUSION FOR ANY LAY OPINIONS HE INTENDS TO PROFFER AT TRIAL IN SUPPORT OF HIS DAMAGE THEORIES. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 12/17/2018. 12/17/2018 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SES AND E-MAILED.(amas)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO EXCLUDE PATRICIA VAN DE KAMPS TESTIMONY ON THE NONPAYMENT FOR WORK PERFORMED IS DENIED. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO PRECLUDE EVIDENCE OF THREE YEARS WORTH DAMAGES UNDER THE FLSA IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REASSERT THIS REQUEST AT TRIAL. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF YOCHEVED SHMUELY AND DEBRA HACKETT IS GRANTED IN PART WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED TESTIMONY ON MR. REDDINGS INTEGRITY AND DEFAULT OF BLAMING SUBORDINATES FOR HIS OWN MISTAKES. THE PLAI NTIFFS MAY RE-REQUEST TO INTRODUCE SUCH TESTIMONY, AT TRIAL, IF THEY ARE ABLE TO PROVE TO THE COURT THAT THE EVIDENCE IS ADMISSIBLE UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE. TO THE EXTENT THEIR TESTIMONY COVERS ANY OF THE OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED IN PLAINTI FFS PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM, DEFENDANTS REQUEST IS DENIED IN PART WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO OBJECT TO THE TESTIMONY AT TRIAL. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO EXCLUDE THE DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE TESTIMONY OF YOCHEVED SHMUELY AND DEBRA HACKETT IS GRANTED IN PART WITH RE SPECT TO PLAINTIFFS EXHIBIT NOS. 24 AND 27, AND ANY EVIDENCE OFFERED TO PROVE MR. REDDINGS INTEGRITY AND DEFAULT OF BLAMING SUBORDINATES FOR HIS OWN MISTAKES. THE PLAINTIFFS MAY RE-REQUEST TO INTRODUCE SUCH EVIDENCE, AT TRIAL, IF THEY ARE ABLE TO PRO VE TO THE COURT THAT THE EVIDENCE IS PERMISSIBLE UNDER THE FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE. TO THE EXTENT THE DOCUMENTS COVER ANY OF THE OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED IN PLAINTIFFS PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM, DEFENDANTS REQUEST IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO OBJECT TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE RICHARD A. LLORET ON 12/7/18. 12/11/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
