WELDING ENGINEERS LTD. v. NFM/WELDING ENGINEERS, INC.
| WELDING ENGINEERS LTD. |
| NFM/WELDING ENGINEERS, INC. |
| 2:2016cv04850 |
| September 7, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the U.S. |
| NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF WELDING ENGINEERS LTD. ("WELDING") AND AGAINST NFM/WELDING ENGINEERS, INC. ("NFM") ON COUNT FOUR OF NFM'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED, IN PART, IN FAVOR OF NFM AND AGAINST WELDING ON COUNT SIX OF NFM'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT. DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED, IN PART, IN FAVOR OF WELDING AND AGAINST NFM ON COUNT SIX OF NFM'S COUNTERCLAIM FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 1/26/21. 1/26/21 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
|
Filing
84
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 58) IS GRANTED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. FURTHER ORDERED THAT DECLARATORY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN DEFENDANTS FAVOR AS TO COUNT V OF THE COUNTERCLAIMS AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE NITZA I QUINONES ALEJANDRO ON 11/26/18. 11/26/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rf, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
