POWELL v. LINK et al
| RAYMOND GASTON POWELL, III |
| CYNTHIA LINK, BRUCE CASTOR and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY |
| 2:2016cv05085 |
| September 22, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Montgomery |
| TIMOTHY R. RICE |
| JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER THAT PETITIONER'S MOTION TO ALTER AND AMEND JUDGMENT (DOCKET NO. 47) IS DENIED; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 3/9/21. 3/9/21 ENTERED AND COPIES (NOT MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER) AND E-MAILED.(er, )
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER THAT PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B)(6) (DOCKET NO. 41 ) IS DENIED; AND THERE IS NO CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 7/28/20. 7/29/20 ENTERED AND COPIES NOT MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, )
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE TIMOTHY R. RICE. THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC. NO. 23) IS DENIED; PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STAY AND ABEY (DOC. NO. 24) IS DENIED; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 2/27/18. 2/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
