UTESCH v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
| JOHN UTESCH |
| LANNETT COMPANY, INC., ARTHUR P. BEDROSIAN and MARTIN P. GALVAN |
| 2:2016cv05932 |
| November 16, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Outside the State of PA. |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 77 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
198
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO EXCLUDE (ECF 175 ) IS DENIED; DEFENDANTS MOTION TO EXCLUDE (ECF 177 ) IS DENIED; PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (ECF 121 ) IS GRANTED, AND THE FOLLOWING CLASS IS CERTIFIED PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVI L PROCEDURE 23(B)(3): A. ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED OR ACQUIRED THE PUBLICLY TRADED COMMON STOCK OF LANNETT COMPANY, INC. (LANNETT OR THE COMPANY) DURING THE PERIOD FROM JULY 15, 2014 AND OCTOBER 31, 2017, INCLUSIVE (THE CLASS PERIOD), AN D WHO WERE DAMAGED THEREBY (THE CLASS). EXCLUDED FROM THE CLASS ARE DEFENDANTS, THE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY, AT ALL RELEVANT TIMES, MEMBERS OF THEIR IMMEDIATE FAMILIES AND THEIR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES, HEIRS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS AND AN Y ENTITY IN WHICH DEFENDANTS HAVE OR HAD A CONTROLLING INTEREST. LEAD PLAINTIFF UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND PLAINTIFF IRONWORKERS LOCALS 40, 361 & 417 UNION SECURITY FUNDS ARE APPOINTED AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVES. LEAD COUNSEL ABRAHAM, FRUCHTER & TWERSKY, LLP IS APPOINTED AS CLASS COUNSEL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 23(G). SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/12/21. 8/12/21 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
|
Filing
138
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTIONS OF DOCUMENTS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/9/20. 12/10/20 ENTERED AND E-MAILED, NOT MAILED TO COUNSEL.(JL )
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF NO. 130 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THIS ORDER, DEFENDANTS SHALL, CONSISTENT WITH THE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM OPINION, PRODUCE TO LEAD PLAINTIFF ALL RELEVANT, NON-PROTECTED DOC UMENTS RESPONSIVE TO REQUEST NOS. 16, 17, 18, AND 19; AND IF DEFENDANTS SEEK TO WITHHOLD ANY RESPONSIVE DOCUMENTS BASED ON ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE OR THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE, DEFENDANTS SHALL PROVIDE AT THE TIME OF PRODUCTION A PRIVILEGE LOG. ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/9/20. 12/10/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. ATTY SOLUM NOT MAILED.(va, )
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER DENYING 84 MOTION TO DISMISS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 5/15/19. 5/16/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS 69 MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS AMENDED COMPLAINT SHALL BE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND AND SHALL RE-FILE ANY AMENDED COMPLAINT BY AUGUST 21, 2018. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/30/18. 7/31/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
