CORMAN et al v. THE NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
JAMES CORMAN, ENERGY ALTERNATIVE STUDIES, INC. and THE ENERGY ALTERNATIVE STUDIES INC. HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN |
THE NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
2:2017cv03912 |
August 31, 2017 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Outside the State of PA. |
WENDY BEETLESTONE |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO THEIR SECTION 1132(A)(2) ERISA CLAIM PREMISED ON THE PURPORTED 2002 CHANGE OF POLICY OWNERSHIP. DEFENDANTS MOTION IS GRANTED AS TO PLAINTIFFS RICO CLAIMS UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1962(C), WHICH CLAIMS ARE HEREBY DISMISSED. THE PARTIES MOTIONS ARE DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/26/22. 7/26/22 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va) |
Filing 48 ORDER DENYING 33 MOTION TO DISMISS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 7/11/19. 7/11/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (va, ) |
Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED; ALL CLAIMS IN PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS ARE GIVEN LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT BY 10/12/18. IF PLAINTIFFS FAIL TO DO SO, THE COMPLAINT WILL BE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 9/27/18. 9/28/18 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.