MIRANDA et al v. C.H. ROBINSON CO. et al
| ELIOTT MIRANDA and ESTRELITA MIRANDA |
| C.H. ROBINSON CO., ISABELLA SHIPPING CO., LTD., UPALA AGRICOLA S.A. and TRANSPORTE GRANT SA |
| ISABELLA SHIPPING CO., LTD. |
| C.H. ROBINSON CO., TRANSPORTE GRANT SA and UPALA AGRICOLA S.A. |
| 2:2018cv00553 |
| February 6, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Philadelphia Office |
| Philadelphia |
| MICHAEL M. BAYLSON |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
ORDERED THAT UPALAS MOTION TO CERTIFY IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 4/2/20. 4/2/20 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(jaa, )
|
|
Filing
131
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT UPALA'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT UNDER FRCP 12(B)(2) IS DENIED. UPALA AND C.H. ROBINSON'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT III OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE DENIED; UPALA AND C.H. ROBINSON'S MOTIONS TO DI SMISS COUNT IV OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT ARE GRANTED, AND COUNT IV IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS TO UPALA AND C.H. ROBINSON; AND AS TO DEFENDANT TRANSPORTES GRANT, S.A., THE AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDIDCE IN ITS ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO THE REPRESENTATIONS BY COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS AT THE OCTOBER 25, 2019 HEARING. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 11/13/19. 11/14/19 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
