CHAPOLINI v. CAPODANNO et al
VINCENT AIENNE CHAPOLINI |
ANTHONY CAPODANNO, THOMAS JOHNSON, KEVIN DONOHUE and UPPER DARBY POLICE DEPARTMENT |
2:2018cv02629 |
June 21, 2018 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
Philadelphia Office |
Delaware |
EDWARD G. SMITH |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 80) IS GRANTED. SUMMARY JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF ON ALL COUNTS IN THE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. NO. 63); 2. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMOVE THIS CASE FROM CIVIL SUSPENSE AND RETURN IT TO THE UNDERSIGNEDS ACTIVE DOCKET; AND 3. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/20/2021. 9/20/2021 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. NOT MAILED TO PRO SE.(sg, ) |
Filing 35 ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 27 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS FOLLOWS: A. THE MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS DISMISSAL OF (1) THE FAILURE TO SUPERVISE CLAIM AGAINST GLENN GAMBER (GAMBER) RELATING THE ALLEGED FAIL URE TO PROVIDE MIRANDA WARNINGS; ETC. AS HEREIN. B. THE MOTION IS GRANTED TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS TO HAVE THE COURT STRIKE THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF AND THIS REQUEST FOR RELIEF IS STRICKEN FROM THE AMENDED COMPLAINT; AND C. IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTION IS DENIED; ETC. AS HEREIN. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(E)(2)(B)(II), THE PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY AND THE PLAINTIFFS EXCESSIVE FORCE CLAIM AGAINST JAMES FLORES ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE PLAINTIFFS REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF AN ATTORNEY (DOC. NO. 13) IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE PLAINTIFF SHALL HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; ETC. AS HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 9/5/19. 9/6/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(mas, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.