ECHOLS v. HAINSWORTH et al
| LEONARD ECHOLS |
| THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, MELISSA HAINSWORTH and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA |
| 2:2018cv03574 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| MARILYN HEFFLEY |
| JOSEPH F LEESON |
| Habeas Corpus: (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER THAT THE COMMONWEALTH'S RESPONSE TO THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DUE ON OR BEFORE 11/27/18.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 9/27/18.9/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
|
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by MELISSA HAINSWORTH, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA..Motions referred to MARILYN HEFFLEY.(ANDRESS, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley's chambers dated 9/24/18 re: Acknowledging receipt of State Court Record. (pr, ) |
| State Court Record received and forwarded to Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley's chambers. (pr, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE A SPECIFIC AND DETAILED ANSWER, WITH EXHIBITS ATTACHED, WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. THE PROTHONOTARY, CLERK OF COURT, OR OFFICE OF JUDICIAL SUPPORT OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY SHALL FILE WITH THE CLERK OF THIS COURT COPIES OF ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING TRANSCRIPTS OF NOTES OF TESTIMONY AT ARRAIGNMENT, TRIAL, SENTENCING, SUPPRESSION HEARINGS, POST CONVICTION HEARINGS, PETITIONS, PLEADINGS, OPINIONS AND BRIEFS OF STATE COURT PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF COMMONWEALTH v. LEONARD NICHOLS, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY,CP-51-CR-0907531-2005 WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER. PRISONER STATE RECORD DUE BY 10/28/2018.. SIGNED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARILYN HEFFLEY ON 8/29/18. 8/29/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, RESPONDENTS AND E-MAILED TO CCP-PHILA. COUNTY. (pr, )
|
| Mailed petition, docket, and order dated 8/29/18 to D.A.-Philadelphia County. (pr, ) |
| Copy of docket sheet, Order #3 and Petition #1 emailed to THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. (mas, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT THE ABOVE CAPTIONED CASE IS REFERRED TO THE HONORABLE MARILYN HEFFLEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 72.1.IV(C), ALL ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE, AND THAT NEW ISSUES AND EVIDENCE SHALL NOT BE RAISED AFTER THE FILING OF THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IF THEY COULD HAVE BEEN PRESENTED TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE; AND, THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE THE DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA WITH A COPY OF THE PETITION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOSEPH F. LEESON, JR ON 8/27/18. 8/27/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND A COPY OF PETITION MAILED TO THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA. (mas, )
|
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (ahf) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number 183525.), filed by LEONARD ECHOLS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheets, #2 Envelope)(ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
