BRINK v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
| LUCILLE M. BRINK |
| COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 2:2019cv02350 |
| May 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| LINDA K CARACAPPA |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by LUCILLE M. BRINK re: David F. Chermol served Summons and Complaint upon COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY by Certified Mail. (Attachments: #1 Summons Executed on Attorney General of USA, DOJ)(CHERMOL, DAVID) |
| Filing 5 Acceptance of Service by U.S. Attorney Re: accepted summons and complaint on behalf of the United States Attorney (only). (fdc, ) |
| Filing 4 Social Security Magistrate Consent by LUCILLE M. BRINK.. (CHERMOL, DAVID) |
| Filing 3 Social Security Notice of Case Assignment (Attachments: #1 Consent)(ahf) |
| Filing 2 Procedural Order 5/31/2019 Entered and copies e-mailed. (ahf) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 198089.), filed by LUCILLE M. BRINK. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Designation Form, #3 Case Management Track Form)(ahf) |
| Summons Issued as to COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. 2 Forwarded To: Counsel & 1 to AUSA on 5/31/2019 (ahf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
