FELDER et al v. COLVIN et al
| WHITNEY N. FELDER |
| ANDREW SAUL and EX- CAROLYN W. COLVIN |
| MR. STEPHEN L. FELDER |
| 2:2019cv03525 |
| August 1, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| WENDY BEETLESTONE |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER THAT FELDER'S CASE IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 9/20/19. 9/23/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, )
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER THAT STEPHEN FELDER MAY NOT REPRESENT WHITNEY FELDER IN THIS MATTER, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TERMINATE STEPHEN FELDER FROM THE DOCKET, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL PROVIDE WHITNEY FELDER WITH AN APPROPRIATE NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, BEARING THE CIVIL ACTION NUMBER OF THIS CASE, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 8/8/19. 8/9/19 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLFF.(kw, )
|
| Copy of Non-Prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis mailed to pro se plff on 8/9/19. (kw, ) |
| Filing 2 PRO SE NOTICE RE:GUIDELINES (jwl, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ANDREW SAUL, filed by WHITNEY N. FELDER. NO ENVELOPE. NO FEE. NO IFP.(jwl, ) Modified on 8/6/2019 (jwl, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Pennsylvania Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
